Review agents
20 specialists, one verdict per finding
Scanners are good at spotting patterns and bad at judging context. Each finding goes to an agent that knows its vulnerability class — and decides whether it's real, explains it, and suggests the fix.
Specialist agents share context, then produce one high-signal report.
Web & injection
SQL injection
Decides whether attacker-controlled input actually reaches a SQL or NoSQL query unparameterized.
Scope & why it matters →Cross-site scripting (XSS)
Checks whether untrusted data is rendered into HTML or JavaScript without contextual encoding.
Scope & why it matters →Server-side request forgery (SSRF)
Checks whether a server-side request can be pointed at a host the attacker chooses.
Scope & why it matters →Command & code injection
Checks whether user input reaches a shell, eval or template-evaluation sink.
Scope & why it matters →Unsafe deserialization
Checks whether untrusted bytes are deserialized by a mechanism that can build arbitrary objects.
Scope & why it matters →Identity & access
Authentication & JWT
Checks that identity, tokens and sessions are actually verified and hardened.
Scope & why it matters →Access control & authorization
Checks that each sensitive action is authorized for the specific object, not just a logged-in user.
Scope & why it matters →Directory & LDAP integration
Reviews Active Directory and LDAP code for injection, cleartext binds and hard-coded credentials.
Scope & why it matters →Secrets & crypto
Infra & pipeline
Infrastructure & IaC
Reviews Terraform, Helm, Ansible and server config for insecure defaults and exposure.
Scope & why it matters →Cloud security
Checks cloud resources for public exposure, wildcard IAM and long-lived keys.
Scope & why it matters →Container & Kubernetes
Checks Dockerfiles and Kubernetes manifests for root, privileged and host-level access.
Scope & why it matters →CI/CD pipeline
Checks pipelines for leaked secrets, untrusted code execution and over-broad tokens.
Scope & why it matters →Supply chain
Checks dependency and build-time trust: pinning, lockfiles, registries and remote code.
Scope & why it matters →Blast radius & data exposure
Assesses how much damage a compromise of this code could cause, and how to shrink it.
Scope & why it matters →Platform & AI
AI / LLM safety
Checks LLM application code for prompt injection and unsafe handling of model output.
Scope & why it matters →Network & transport security
Checks that data in transit is encrypted and certificates are actually verified.
Scope & why it matters →Privilege & file permissions
Checks file permissions, temp files, symlinks and unnecessary root.
Scope & why it matters →Mobile client security
Reviews Android and iOS code for on-device storage, transport and component exposure.
Scope & why it matters →Beyond findings
Agent setup reviewer
Inventories the LLM-agent setup in your repo — agents, skills, memory, hooks, MCP servers, frameworks — and reviews it for prompt-injection, tool-safety and secrets risks.
Scope & why it matters →General reviewer
Findings that match no specialist still get a verdict, explanation and fix from a general security reviewer — nothing is silently dropped.
Common questions
How does a finding get routed to an agent?
By the finding's CWE first, then by keywords in the scanner rule ID or file path. Findings that match no specialist go to a general reviewer, so nothing is dropped.
Do the agents find new vulnerabilities on their own?
No. They validate what Semgrep, Gitleaks and Trivy report: a verdict (real or likely false positive) with a confidence score, a plain-English explanation and a suggested fix.
What code do the agents see?
Only the minimal snippet around each finding, with secret values redacted. That keeps your source private but means a cross-file data flow can be misjudged — which is why every verdict carries a confidence score.
See the agents on your own code
100 free credits, no credit card. Connect a GitHub repo and run a scan.
Get started free